This Tuesday deep-dive edition of the Max Revenue Letter is brought to you by BindPoint, our official premium finance partner. Fast approvals, flexible terms, and a team that actually picks up the phone. Call Chris and Justin at (214) 888-8900 today. Or click this logo to learn more:

A few weeks ago I had a very interesting back and forth with a client.

(no, I didn’t get fired.)

I was wrapping up a renewal with a construction client of mine that does about $50 million a year in revenue, all in the civil space.

We were going through the numbers together, line by line, until we got to the big one:

Commission.

As I always do, I put it right there for him to see. What we were set to make on the account, roughly $100,000, and a second option, if he preferred, I could quote it net of commission and run the account on a flat fee of $75,000.

"As I told you when you first hired me, I will always be transparent with you. Here's exactly how the commission works. You can leave it as-is, or we can move to a fee and save you a bit more money. You don't have to decide today, I just want you to have the information."

He stopped me before I even finished:

"Keep it as is. I have no issues with you making money, as long as you're being transparent and doing what's best for us, which I feel like you are and have been since we hired you."

Not going to lie. It felt good to hear that.

Fifteen years in this business, and it was yet another reminder of something so many producers forget.

When producers lose an account, their first recation is to blame price.

"A competitor came in 15% cheaper."

Or maybe it's easier to blame the other guy:

“He bad-mouthed us, he told the client something that wasn't true, he made promises he can't keep.”

While there’s probably some truth to both, neither one usually tells the whole story.

Because in my experience, neither are rarely the real underlying reason they fired you. Commercial buyers almost never leave over a few thousand dollars, and a competitor can't badmouth his way into an account that’s rock solid in the trust department.

The real culprit is often a loss, or a slow leak, of trust.

Remember, insureds aren't just buying a policy, they're buying peace of mind. The moment working with you makes them feel cornered, neglected, or taken advantage of, that trust starts to gradually leak out. And once it's gone, a lower price from a competitor is just the excuse they finally use to leave. It was never really the reason.

So where do the leaks usually come from?

I lump them into three buckets. The renewal process, transparency around commission, and communication. Fix the holes in those three buckets and you'll keep clients for much much longer.

Ignore them, and no amount of clever positioning or price will save you.

A lot of the damage in this business starts at renewal time.

Two failures in particular do the most damage, and they're really two sides of the same coin.

The first is timing. To most insureds, delivering renewal terms right before expiration is an act of aggression. It forces an existential decision under duress, and they flat out don’t like it.

“I have zero options and no time left. This broker backed me into a corner to protect their own book.”

Whether it’s true or not, it’s their POV. And their POV is your reality.

The fix is easy. Get started 120-days before renewal. Set strict internal deadlines with your service team, and draw a firm line with carrier underwriters that terms come back at least 30 days out. And if a market runs late anyway, don't sit on it hoping things improve. Loop the client into the standoff in real time:

"We gave the carrier a deadline of Tuesday. They missed it. I'm holding their feet to the fire."

Now the delay becomes proof of your advocacy instead of your negligence.

The second is showing up without options. Walking into a renewal meeting with nothing but a single quote from the incumbent makes you look lazy, even if the number is fine. The client starts wondering what exactly they're paying you for. To be fair, going out and spraying and praying to the market every single year isn’t smart either.

The fix is a mandatory pre-renewal strategy meeting, 90 to 100 days out, built right into that same 120-day timeline.

Use it to educate the buyer on underwriting psychology, why shopping the account every year actually leads to adverse selection and worse pricing over time. Then set the benchmark together:

"If I can lock in our current carrier at a 4% increase or lower, do we accept it and save you the hassle, or do you still want me to take this to market?"

Most clients don't actually want five different options. They just want evidence that you’re actively negotiating on their behalf, on a timeline that doesn't leave them cornered.

Build the process so both of those things are true, deliver early and show up with a real strategy, and you've already closed off the two most common reasons a client starts looking elsewhere.

This is the one that played out for me in that proposal.

As accounts grow, a standard 10 to 15% commission can quietly balloon into $60,000, $80,000, even six figures in agency revenue. If your service ever starts to feel standard, or a little late, that number suddenly looks less like fair compensation and more like theft the moment a competitor points it out:

“They made six figures off your business last year just to forward a few endorsements, does that seem fair?”

The way around it is to get ahead of the number yourself. Disclose compensation proactively, from day one:

"Here's how I get paid, and here's exactly what that commission looks like."

Once an account crosses a real threshold, say $50,000 to $60,000 in revenue, bring the conversation to them before anyone else can:

"Here's what we make today. We can keep it as-is, or transition to a flat fee of $X. Which do you prefer?"

What I've found, and what happened again on that construction account, is that good buyers actually want you to make money. They just don’t want to feel played. Putting your revenue on the table voluntarily, and offering a real alternative, signals a level of trust that a competitor simply can't compete with on price.

Nine times out of ten they’ll tell you to keep the commission. Not because the money doesn't matter to them, but because trust matters more.

This is the leak that's easiest to miss.

It's whether you pick up the phone when the client calls, or whether it takes three days and a follow-up email to hear back. It's whether the certificate they needed same-day actually went out same-day. It's the basic, unglamorous, day-to-day service work that never makes it into a renewal presentation but is the entire reason a client feels taken care of, or doesn't.

Claims are the highest-stakes version. Clients fire brokers over claims for two opposite reasons: a claim gets denied, or the carrier pays a frivolous claim too fast without putting up a fight. In both cases, the underlying feeling is powerlessness. The owner believes their capital or their reputation took a hit while their broker sat quietly on the sidelines.

For a legitimate denial, never just forward the underwriter's cold denial letter and call it handled. Call the client first, walk them through the policy language yourself, and explain the boundary directly so they don't feel blindsided by a form letter.

For the opposite scenario, where the carrier rolled over and paid something it probably shouldn't have, don't defend the carrier. Mirror the client's frustration:

"I agree with you, this is infuriating. Here's why the carrier took the nuisance-settlement route legally, but let's talk about whether we put them on notice or remarket this line at renewal."

Advocacy and service that happen quietly behind the scenes might as well not happen at all. If the client doesn't see the effort, whether that's on a six-figure claim or a same-day certificate request, they don't feel it.

You have to be visibly, actively present, or it doesn't count.

We spend so much time talking about retention rates, processes and procedures, workflows, etc.

And all of that matters. But underneath it, there's a much simpler question worth asking:

“If I were them, what would I want to hear? What would I want to see? What would I want to be asked? What would make me feel valued as a client?”

Then, just do that.

I think sometimes we overcomplicate this business. In the end, it’s just humans helping humans. And humans run on trust.

This is also, I think, where a lot of people are misreading what AI is about to do to this industry. AI will get faster and cheaper at quoting, at comparing markets, at a lot of the mechanical work.

But it can't fix producers being lazy or incompetent.

As long as humans are on the buy side, they will want competent, hard-working humans they trust on the sell side. So while everyone else is racing to automate their way to an edge, the real edge is still the oldest one:

Earning and keeping the trust of another human. -MS

P.S. Know someone who should read this? Share it with them using your unique refferal link below and earn some merch.